The Worst Things About the New iPad are :
Dual-core processor: The A5X with quad-core graphics processing is a much-needed upgrade, especially in light of what Cupertino envisions this device doing soon. And yet, there are still users who won’t care because it’s not quad-core — which has become akin to a “designer name” in mobile tech. For now, it’s like the Gucci of mobile processors.
No higher storage option: There’s no way to up the built-in storage. No 128GB version is available.
No Siri: The new iPad comes without Siri. Dictation is better than nothing, but there were loads of iPad hopefuls holding out for our girl Siri. And there’s little chance that the iPad Mini — even if it does come this fall, as rumored — will come in to plug up the holes with voice command and a quad-core chip on board.
Slightly heavier, fatter depth: It’s 9.4mm now, up from the 8.8mm of the previous model — which means any close-fitting iPad accessories have suddenly become obsolete. Again. And the weight’s going up 50+ grams? Um, aren’t devices supposed to get sleeker over time? Instead of unveiling a sexy new take on the Apple design aesthetic, it pretty much gave us the same old thing, but fatter.
No name: It’s understandable if the company’s moving away from a numbering nomenclature, to match its line of Mac products. Thing is, this breaks with the previous naming convention for mobility products, making things just plain confusing. A year later, we still refer to iPad 2 as the iPad 2. But this time next year, we can’t possibly still be calling this “The New iPad.”
What was your take on the new iPad? Do you have a best/worst list of your own? Please share it with me in the comment section below.
This is the only time I've been to your site. Thank you for posting more details.
ReplyDeletemy webpage > westernport bay fishing charters